Safe & Effective #2: Where *did* this Cancer come from?

Can propaganda and cognitive dissonance cover up a 6.2 sigma event?

There are a couple alarming trends to be found within the weekly death data that is published by the CDC. But today we’ll talk about everyone’s favorite subject: cancer.

That’s a joke. Everyone hates cancer. It’s a cruel and ruthless killer and deviously difficult to treat. The best known treatments out there involve pumping the body full of radioactive poison. While that may be the most effective option now, that’s obviously not ideal!

But to the subject at hand, pseudonymous researcher The Ethical Skeptic has been monitoring specific cuts in the CDC’s mortality data for some time. And perhaps most alarming is the trend in deaths coded as malignant neoplasms… also known as cancer deaths:

What we see here is the trend for these deaths since the start of 2017 in light orange. As you can tell, the trend is quite stable and follows a slight-but-expected seasonal pattern. In the summer, we’ll see 11,250 deaths per week usually, and about 11,750 at the winter peak.

Now again, because this trend is so stable, we can set a fairly reliable expectation for how many deaths we should see in a week: this is noted in the dark orange dotted line. This data is based off the 2014 to 2019 averages each week, and normalized to grow at 0.23% in accordance with our population growth.

Things start to get interesting in 2020: we see a dip down in early 2020 before returning to relatively normal levels until the winter, where we don’t see our usual peak. Both of these effects are likely artifacts of Covid taking the deaths of some old and frail people who likely would have died of cancer if Covid didn’t get them first. This is to be expected: cancer most impacts the elderly and (along with the treatment) tends to degrade the immune system such that they’d be an easy target for Covid. So this is notable but not worrying.

Where we start to see a worrying change though is in April of 2021. We had been trending well below expectation for the first two to three months of the year. So much so, that we’d want to adjust the baseline to account for the pull forward effect (PFE as noted on the chart). This should be done the year after a pandemic with substantial excess death in the elderly population. With Covid unfortunately killing many elderly people, we would expect to see a drop in cancer deaths, which we did see for the first couple months of the year.

But then we see now the trend since April of 2021 has been alarming, with cancer deaths rising to that 11,750 per week number and staying stubbornly at that level for almost an entire year now. Add it up, and that’s about 18,000 excess cancer deaths since April of 2021, and it is a trend that shows no sign of abating.

This increase, by the way, is significant. If you assess the difference between expected deaths and actuals, actual deaths are 6.2 standard deviations above the expectations. That, put simply, doesn’t happen by accident. The chances that we’d naturally see such a variation without an exact cause are approximately 1 in 3.5 billion.

And again, while we can’t prove causality on this point alone, let’s remember where we were in April of 2021: right in the middle of our unprecedented national experiment to “vaccinate” everyone. The elderly had received the shots in January and February, and it was opening up to the general population in March and April.

So, 18,000 incremental lives lost so far. That loss of life is tragic and notable in its own right, but the real risk is what could be coming down the road. If there is a relationship between these shots and cancer, we could be seeing 10x or even 100x more excess cancer deaths down the road. Unlike heart related issues that we wrote about last time, cancer deaths are a lagging indicator as it will go undetected for a time and even then it’ll take weeks, months, or even years to cause a death. The notable increase we are seeing now could be the literal tip of the iceberg.

Why could this be happening? There are plausible theories as to why and how the vaccine could cause aggressive cancers. We know that the vaccine particles make their way around the entire body rather than staying in the arm. We know that the spike protein is toxic to cells and that the vaccine triggers the body to generate these spike proteins in large amounts. And we know that the vaccine temporarily weakens the immune system and that the immune system plays a vital role in containing and attacking early cancerous cells that form.

---

An Aside: The Factcheckers

If you look up some of the above points, you will likely see various “factchecks” that claim to debunk a couple of the points, namely that the spike protein is toxic. As the article linked above gets into: these “factchecks” are wrong. They are propaganda pushed by a pharmaceutical industry happy to make billions, provided air cover by a government desperate to disguise their mistakes, and amplified by a media made up of circus seals who clap on demand.

If you are going to read one link from this article, make it this one (same one that is linked above):

SARS-CoV2 Spike protein is a toxin

This is critical to understand: there are severe and dangerous flaws in how our institutions work. Public Health, Government, and the Media - they are all broken. We view these as organizations of professionals out to do the right thing. This is wrong. Rather, they are bureaucratic morasses filled with groupthink and cowards looking to cover their own ass.

---

So look - I hope that I am wrong on this. Perhaps the rise in cancer is due to missed early screenings during 2020 and the rates will soon go back down. But we don’t know. We don’t know what the long-term effects are because we can’t know given how the products where tested and rolled out.

It is the epitome of human hubris and human stupidity for us to brush off such an alarming trend. Those who do out themselves only as part of a propagandized cult of vax junkies. The reality is that these products influence the body in complex ways. While we never should have rolled out such a dangerous experiment with such reckless abandon, the best we can do now is monitor the data and accept open inquiry in order to figure out what is going on and what we should do about it.